Awards

Winners

Best Paper Winner 

FEES-IS: Real-time Instance Segmentation of Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing

by Weihao Weng1, Xin Zhu1, Mitsuyoshi Imaizumi2, Shigeyuki Murono2.
1University of Aizu, 2Fukushima Medical University. 

Best student paper winner

Evaluating the effect of sparse convolutions on point cloud compression

by Davi Lazzarotto, Touradj Ebrahimi.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Best 3MT winner

Markus Sebastian Bakken Storeide, Department of Computer Science, NTNU Gjøvik

Mobina Mobini,  Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology  

Tan-Sy Nguyen, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, France.

Best Reviewer Award

The selection process for the best reviewers of EUVIP 2023.

The selection panel included :

Stefania Colonnese, Roma La Sapienza University, Italy

Djamila Aouada, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Ali Amirshahi, NTNU, Norway

Nuno Rodriguez, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Portugal.

Azeddine Beghdadi, Universite Sorbonne Paris Nord, France

For each of the 92 reviewers available on the CMT system, the reviews of the assigned papers were evaluated

Outstanding Reviewers 

Maria Paula Queluz

Fernando Pereira

Wassim Rharbaoui

Lucas Thomaz

Lei Qi

Benoit Vozel

Best Reviewer Award

Maria Paula Queluz

Fernando Pereira

Benoit Vozel

General Information

EUVIP 2023 will select winners to receive the Best Paper Award, the Best Student Paper Award, and the Best Reviewer Award.

Best Paper Award and the Best Student Paper Award

The Best Paper Award and the Best Student Paper Award aim to honour exceptional technical contributions and promote high-quality research within the technical scope of the workshop.

The final awards decisions will be taken after the presentation of these papers.

The Best Paper/Student Paper Awards Selection Guidelines are:

  • Exclusions: The papers from the General Co-chairs, Technical Program Chairs, Special Sessions Chairs, and Awards Chairs are excluded from consideration.
  • Initial Score Based Selection: The 5 accepted papers receiving the highest scores and good recognition in the review process are chosen as candidates, by the Awards Chairs.
  • Candidates Presentation: The 5 selected papers will be arranged for presentation, in non-time-overlapping sessions.
  • Award Selection Committee: The Award Selection Committee may include members of EUVIP 2023 Organizing Committee without any conflict of interest with the competing authors, notably General Co-Chairs, Technical Program Chairs, Special Session Chairs and Award Chairs, and members of the EUVIP Steering Committee, in a maximum of 5 members. To be a valid member of this committee, the experts will have to score all the candidate papers.
  • Award Criteria: The Award Selection Committee will consider the technical quality, the technical novelty, the potential impact, the editorial quality, the presentation quality, and the capability to answer questions.
  • Award Selection Procedure: The Award Selection Committee members should attend the presentations and give a vote between 1 and 5 (best) to each paper, considering the award criteria.
  • Winners Definition: After consolidation of the votes by the Awards Chairs, the paper receiving the highest overall score by the Award Selection Committee will be awarded as the Best Paper Award (even if the first author is a student); the paper with the second highest vote and with a student as the first author (that should be also the presenter of the paper) will be awarded the Best Student Paper Award. In case of a tie, the award will be attributed to the papers tied and the award amount split between them.
  • Issues: If there is any issue arising before the final decision can be reached, the Award Selection Committee will meet at the conference site to resolve.
Best Reviewer Award

The Best Reviewer Award aims to acknowledge the outstanding contribution of one reviewer, and to promote high quality reviews.

The Best Reviewer Award Selection Guidelines are:

  • Exclusions: The General Co-Chairs, Technical Program Chairs, Special Session Chairs and Award Chairs are excluded from consideration.
  • Reviewer Selection Committee: The Reviewer Selection Committee will include members of the EUVIP 2023 Organizing Committee, notably General Co-Chairs, Technical Program Chairs, Special Session Chairs and Award Chairs, in a maximum of 7 members.
  • Award Criteria: The Reviewer Award Selection Committee will consider the reviewing quality, notably insightful and supportive feedback promoting the paper improvement by the authors, and the timeliness of the reviews.

The recipients of the Awards will be announced at the Workshop dinner.